Full FeedThe Finder is an idiot
Well, okay, maybe that’s a little mean. But, for the core of my Mac experience, that little blue smiley face certainly does some dumb things.
- The Path Bar - Well, at least there is one in Leopard. But it isn’t spring loaded. Whereas almost every other representation of a folder (dock icon, finder icon, icon in the Finder sidebar, etc.) will open if a file is hovered over it, the path bar doesn’t work this way. I can drag a file onto the icon in the path bar and drop it that way, so why can’t I hover to go back into that folder?
- No “Sticky Move” - Yes, I deliberately avoided calling it cut-and-paste because that’s not the point. The point is, there should be a shortcut I can use to “pick up” a file, and another shortcut I can use to “put it down” in another place. Perhaps Cmd-X and Cmd-V. Perhaps. And no, copy-and-paste-and-go-back-and-delete-the-original-file is not the same thing.
- Remember the Freaking Size of Windows! - Please. Just because a DMG decided to open itself in a smaller, specialized window shouldn’t mean every single Finder window thereafter should take on the same behavior.
- The Trash Can - Possibly the stupidest part of the Finder is the Trash can. First of all, things get stuck in it way to often. And what alert do I get when a file is stuck? It tells me that the file cannot be deleted because it is “in use.” In use by what!? At the very least, Finder could have the decency to tell me what I need to quit in order to trash it. Why doesn’t it tell me, or better yet, give me a button to quit the offending application? Because it really doesn’t know. I can have every single application quit and a file can still get stuck in the trash anyway.
What would you add to this list? Are you perhaps a spatial Finder fan? Or do you like the little Finder just the way it is? Sound off in the comments below!
Subscribe to keep up with the latest Apple news and rumors! - 
Subscribe to our feed
Black Friday 2009
Black Friday is almost here! Gadgetell's got you covered with all the latest news on who's offering the best deals. Dangerous crowds? You're on your own.
Our new podcast: Meet...
We know. Podcasts are so last year - but this one you won't want to miss. Whether it’s a rumor that won’t die, a new product announcement, or just a really good Macintosh or iPhone app find that we have to let you know about, we’ll make sure it’s covered on Appletellcast.
iPhone App Reviews
iPhone Apps. They were great when the App Store was first announced and we could all pick and chose what we wanted, but the number is now overwhelming. Here at Appletell, we'll detail the great iPhone apps we find, and steer you clear from those that aren't worth it even if they're free.
iPhone Game Reviews
As Apple turns the iPhone into one of the most popular gaming devices, the staff of Appletell--gamers and Apple fans alike--are here to help you get the most entertainment value out of your app store purchases.
There is a way to delete files that are in use without having to quit apps. Hold alt/option when you delete the trash.
on February 15, 2009 at 03:47 PM - LINKWhich works… only when a file is ACTUALLY in use. But often Finder will tell me files are in use when they aren’t. And Secure Empty doesn’t do anything then.
on February 15, 2009 at 03:49 PM - LINKlsof | grep -i searchterm
That will show you what is using a file - I use that often. Usually it’s the finder itself.
on February 15, 2009 at 10:01 PM - LINK9 times out of 10, a file won’t delete simply because I used Quick Look on it before moving it to the Trash. I often double check things before moving to the Trash by using Quick Look. However, what’s the point of such a feature when it then won’t allow you to delete the file just because it was the last thing you looked at? The way to get around it is to use Quick Look on anything else, even a folder. Then your trash can be deleted.
on February 16, 2009 at 05:47 AM - LINKReally, really stupid.
There are too many times when option+trashempty doesn’t work either. Finder should show a list of applications and open/stuck files.
For the platform that evangelized cut/copy/paste, it’s really shameful to not have cut/paste for files and folders in the finder. While there are so many things wrong with Vista, I’m constantly annoyed that it makes managing files far easier than the Finder or any of the flaky Finder replacements that we have tried with Leopard.
I agree absolutely that Finder picks the dumbest settings to repeat (misplaced windows, tiny windows, narrow collumns) while never remembering desirable folder-related settings that I need to be efficient (column settings, window positions, windows sizes).
The CoverFlow view of pictures is too small and has too few viewing options. Again, it’s very disappointing that Vista is so much better for its similar function.
The most annoying problem is OS-wide, however! No ability to grab top window edges or corners to re-size! That is absolutely dark-ages dumb. If a Window is too big to fit the screen, like if a large monitor is used with a laptop, but then you go mobile, it takes a script to smack all program windows upside the head to make them fit the screen. That is maximum user unfriendliness.
on February 16, 2009 at 04:05 PM - LINKThe main problem that I have with most UIs is inconsistent behaviour. The Finder is the King of behaviour inconsistencies in OS X. Which is why I believe that John Siracusa’s proposal for a spatial Finder is so appealing.
on February 19, 2009 at 04:06 PM - LINK