How Apple can help Aperture surpass Photoshop
Surely you remember Adobe’s new web-based image editor, Photoshop Express. Why would Adobe release part of Photoshop’s power for free to the public? Simple. They want to allow users to familiarize themselves with some of the features of PS for free in hopes that they will then go on to purchase the boxed version. Now, it just so happens that one of Photoshop’s main competitors, Aperture, is made by Apple. What is Apple doing to drive sales of their image editor software? Frankly, not enough. The real question is, what can they do? If you ask me, it starts with .Mac Web Gallery, but first some important changes must be made to it.
1) Obviously, add image editing features to it. The image viewing on .Mac Web Gallery is slick and easy as you would expect from an Apple product, but it could be so much more. Allow users to edit the photo while online just like Photoshop Express does, except with an Aperture style twist, and you’ve got yourself one awesome platform. This, like PS Express, could give users a chance to see what Aperture is like without having to install a whole demo. It could also prove to the user how functional Aperture can be, even at a limited level. Who knows, maybe they will like the online version so much they will buy the desktop version which would be the whole goal in the first place.
2) Open it up! Currently, the only way to have a Web Gallery is to purchase a .Mac Membership, a $99.95 a year package. Why limit this great service to just a select few who are willing to pay for it? Steve Jobs said it himself in a 2007 press conference, people are moving away from hard media and onto digital media. Apple should be helping them do this by easing the difficulty of the transition (i.e. making a service like this free). Giving them a free, easy to use, feature limited (compared to the desktop version) Aperture online would be a great start to opening up this service and getting some hype behind Aperture.
3) Build a community around it. Everywhere you go, you hear it, “Companies need to start embracing social media.” In my opinion, Apple hasn’t done much to that effect. They could use .Mac Web Gallery as a social service that would not only allow for image editing, but a better way of sharing media. Sure, you can share your Gallery now by sending friends and family the link, but I mean at a higher level, such as being able to add friends. Mr. Jobs also mentioned in that same keynote that the point of this service was to make “send [your media] to the world.” If so, make it easier and more fun to do that. “If you build it, they will come.”
As with anything. there would be roadblocks in tackling such a task. For example, how do deal with the extra traffic to the servers and how much space to give each user. However, Apple has plenty of money to make this work and the outcome would be worth it. In summary, all Apple needs to do it open up .Mac Web Gallery (also, untie it from the .Mac package) and add some more features to it. If you’re from Apple, this would be great to have by, let’s say, June. Sound good? Awesome.
Subscribe to keep up with the latest Apple news and rumors! -
Subscribe to our feed
Black Friday 2009
Black Friday is almost here! Gadgetell's got you covered with all the latest news on who's offering the best deals. Dangerous crowds? You're on your own.
Our new podcast: Meet...
We know. Podcasts are so last year - but this one you won't want to miss. Whether it’s a rumor that won’t die, a new product announcement, or just a really good Macintosh or iPhone app find that we have to let you know about, we’ll make sure it’s covered on Appletellcast.
iPhone App Reviews
iPhone Apps. They were great when the App Store was first announced and we could all pick and chose what we wanted, but the number is now overwhelming. Here at Appletell, we'll detail the great iPhone apps we find, and steer you clear from those that aren't worth it even if they're free.
iPhone Game Reviews
As Apple turns the iPhone into one of the most popular gaming devices, the staff of Appletell--gamers and Apple fans alike--are here to help you get the most entertainment value out of your app store purchases.






Your comparisons are a little off…
Aperture is not meant to be, and never was meant to be, a competitor to Photoshop. Photoshop is for photo manipulation and design work, even more so for AFTER post production on your images. Which is what Aperture is targeted at, “A Post Production Work Flow,” NOT image manipulation.
Aperture is to Lightroom, in the same way Final Cut is to Adobe Premiere… NOT Photoshop, not even close… and never will be.
on April 12, 2008 at 12:49 AM - LINKYou write, “Currently, the only way to have a Web Gallery is to purchase a .Mac Membership, a $99.95 a year package.” This is not correct. Aperture can produce Web galleries for use on servers other than .Mac. Aperture calls these simply “Web pages.” Once generated, they can be loaded to any server the user chooses. The .Mac restriction for Aperture’s so-called “Web galleries” is simply because the advanced features of the galleries require server-end software that can’t be guaranteed at servers other than .Mac. Incidentally, Aperture offers yet a third Web-based option, called “Web journal.”
on May 31, 2008 at 04:38 PM - LINK